Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Ode to Mumbai's Resilience



Remember remember the twenty sixth of November
Hotels, Hospitals and Station bathed in innocent blood.
Guns on their hands and bombs in their bags
Calm and poised striking fear in everyones hearts
Until they were flushed out by brave hearts
I know of reason why such brazen actions
Should ever be forgot...............



Inspired by V for Vendetta

Monday, December 1, 2008

To The One I Love


Looking Ahead for the time to be together
Holding your arms; walk'in the beautiful Weather
Hoping the time jus stops there forever

Thursday, November 27, 2008

A Wednesday:: I know the title is Cliche but it cannot be more apt

26th Nov 2008, A Day Not to FOrget and FOrgive

Attacks on Mumbai were not just a whimsical thought of some brazen group of men but a meticulously planned and in fact well executed. Well the response has not been below par either, the question still remains is what are WE going to do about it from now on? Wake up People Smell the Carnage and Mayhem. Can’t we smell the splattered blood all over our Nation? I am sure one of you is asking me can’t smell it?, just remove your mask and smell it. It stinks not of blood but of those bloody swine who have thought that they can walk away leaving their shit behind.

How did they? Thanks to our so called system (where money is the password to get out), and our wonderful politicians turning blind eye to such things and focussing on more impending issues such as to get rid of North Indians out of state or beating up people on valentine’s day. If they had not such impending issues to attend they might be interested to thwart terrorism. Well i can go on and on about this forever. Oh my i forgot to mention Human Rights, Wow what service they do to humanity? Innocent civilians can get die but not a rapist, murderer or terrorist. When Notorious personalities are killed, a chill runs down their spine and they get all excited and vehement about the act of killing a thing that’s not worth wasting govt taxes on.

With such support no wonder India is a hotspot destination for such Terrorist Fucks, I say Kill EM ALL Burn Them Down, cut their privates and feed them to dogs. When they do capture one alive don’t keep them alive for long, chop chop.

Some may see as an angry rant others may think as lunatics blabber. Am sure there are plenty of us with such pent up anger. All i can do is express in my blog

Let’s not do the usual and shrug it of as another day in our life, make a scar in its name and let there be no more. United We Stand, United We Kick Some Terrorist Ass

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

The Ant and The Grasshopper

This is one forward that i love most and its been coming to my Inbox quite often, hence its here


The Old Story:


The Ant works hard in the withering heat all summer building its house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The Grasshopper thinks the Ant is a fool and laughs dances plays the summer away.

Come winter, the Ant is warm and well fed. The Grasshopper has no food or shelter so he dies out in the cold.

The New Indian Version:

The Ant works hard in the withering heat all summer building its house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The Grasshopper thinks the Ant's a fool and laughs dances plays the summer away.

Come winter, the shivering Grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the Ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving.

NDTV, BBC, CNN show up to provide pictures of the shivering Grasshopper next to a video of the Ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.

The World is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be that this poor Grasshopper is allowed to suffer so Arundhati Roy stages a demonstration in front of the Ant's house.

Medha Patkar goes on a fast along with other Grasshoppers demanding that Grasshoppers be relocated to warmer climates during winter .

Mayawati states this as `injustice' done on Minorities.
Amnesty International and Koffi Annan criticize the Indian Government for not upholding the fundamental rights of the Grasshopper.

The Internet is flooded with online petitions seeking support to the Grasshopper (many promising Heaven and Everlasting Peace for prompt support as against the wrath of God for non-compliance) .

Opposition MPs stage a walkout. Left parties call for 'Bengal Bandh' in West Bengal and Kerala demanding a Judicial Enquiry.

CPM in Kerala immediately passes a law preventing Ants from working hard in the heat so as to bring about equality of poverty among Ants and Grasshoppers.

Lalu Prasad allocates one free coach to Grasshoppers on all Indian Railway Trains, aptly named as the 'Grasshopper Rath'.

Finally, the Judicial Committee drafts the ' Prevention of Terrorism Against Grasshoppers Act' [POTAGA], with effect from the beginning of the winter.

Arjun Singh makes 'Special Reservation ' for Grasshoppers in Educational Institutions in Government Services.

The Ant is fined for failing to comply with POTAGA and having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes,it's home is confiscated by the Government and handed over to the Grasshopper in a ceremony covered by NDTV.

Arundhati Roy calls it ' A Triumph of Justice'.

Lalu calls it 'Socialistic Justice '.

CPM calls it the ' Revolutionary Resurgence of the Downtrodden '

Koffi Annan invites the Grasshopper to address the UN General Assembly.

Many years later...

The Ant has since migrated to the US and set up a multi-billion dollar company in Silicon Valley,

100s of Grasshoppers still die of starvation despite reservation somewhere in India ,

..AND

As a result of losing lot of hard working Ants and feeding the grasshoppers,

India is still a developing country...!! :)

Friday, July 25, 2008

Watchin at the grey sky
Makes me wanna cry
Why did u leave me high and dry
Without givin another try




now for some fun

Walking down the Aisle
Saw the Beauty Smile
Had to run a mile
Before she set Sail
with her fu_kin dyke

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Proof of Global Warming


Was stumbling on the web and voila this is wat i found out

Random Thoughts of a Lost Soul

Was just whiling away my time, then it happened!! train of thoughts. Have decided to put them on my blog be it brilliant or plain lousy !! its mine

Two ways to reach what you want in life!! one is the easy and express way ladder where there are no rungs except one, u stand on it and takes you to the top
Other is the hard and tough one, where one has to toil their ass off to get to the top from the bottom rung to the top, slipping and gripping all along

If one gives away you are bound to get back on the tough one with bruises whereas on the express way its a straight fall to where you begin

Choose Wisely

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Article Worth Reading

Attention all boring people: do not ever try to chat to me. Any attempt to do so will be met with silence

Charlie Brooker
The Guardian,
Monday May 19 2008
Article history

Last week, I had to take a long taxi ride home at the end of an especially prolonged and exhausting day. It was late at night, and the journey was set to last an hour. As the car pulled away, I slumped in the back seat and closed my eyes, enjoying the gentle rock and hum, drifting away to snug semi-consciousness almost immediately. The soft, welcoming arms of sleep began to embrace me. Ahhhhh, I thought, sighing so deeply inside my own mind I felt a warm breeze on the inside of my forehead. Ahhhhh.

But the driver had other plans. He was eyeing me in the mirror. "Long day?" he asked.

"Yes," I replied, half-yawning, snuggling down in my seat.

"I was thinking of taking the A3. What do you think of the A3?" he said.

"Sounds fine to me," I replied snoozily, all heavy lips and closed lids.

"Course the satnav's suggesting another route, but then that's satnav for you, isn't it?" said he, chucking a gentle "ha ha" on the end for good measure. In the world of pointless small talk, "ha ha" is short for "Cuh, life, eh? We're all in it together aren't we, eh?"

"Yes, ha ha," said I, in a half-whisper, allowing my "ha ha" to slide into breathy silence so it sounded like I'd nodded off halfway through saying it. Then I pointedly lolled my head as though I was already in deep REM sleep, in case he was still watching me in the mirror and required some kind of visual cue before he'd shut the hell up. It seemed to work. A whole 40 seconds passed by in silence, long enough for my mock dozing to start turning into the real thing. And then we passed a roadworks sign.

"Roadworks, that's all you need isn't it? Ha ha."

Clearly time to switch tactics. This time I didn't reply. I kept my eyes shut and emitted silence. A minute went by. And then he switched tactics too.

"So what line of work are you in, then?"

The bastard had gone on the offensive. Now he was asking direct questions, impossible to ignore without appearing rude. Furthermore, his inquiry was an almost unassailable conversation-opener: no matter what reply you give, an entire flowchart of punishingly monotonous discourse is guaranteed to follow. Even if you try to be mind-blowingly mundane on purpose. Claim you measure the thickness of cardboard boxes for a living and he can counter by asking if there's much money in it, or how long you've done it, and he'll take it from there until there's no escape; he'll be on and on with his endless questions, tormenting you with his nauseating thirst for basic social interaction until you feel like quietly raising a leg and kicking him square in the bald spot, even if it makes him swerve into the path of an oncoming juggernaut, all headlights and thunder and foghorning blare; shattering glass and shearing metal and the sudden mad sound of your own trapped animal screams - anything to close down him and his voice, his awful bloody probing bloody human bloody voice.

So I told him I was a child pornographer.

OK, I didn't. But that's the only reply I can think of that would have killed any further conversation stone dead, if only because he'd probably make me get out and walk.

But I didn't have the balls. Instead, I resignedly mumbled a response, and together we worked our way along a particularly tedious dialogue tree I've endured many times before, one which lasted the entire duration of the journey and was punctuated by about 1,500 piss-weak "ha ha"s.

Most of the time, boring people are either a) unnoticeable or b) inoffensive. Or c) newspaper columnists. In any case, they're usually easy to avoid. It's only when you're stuck in close proximity to them for an extended period that they truly cross the line from dreary to irksome. Taxis are a classic hot spot, as are long-haul flights. In the misery stakes, few things beat being stranded beside a determined-but-dull conversationalist on a 10-hour transatlantic crossing. Unless you find some polite way of shutting them up early on, you'll be teetering on the verge of assault later.

The sensible method is to politely say, "Sorry, I'm a bit tired - do you mind if I just have a nap?" the minute they start talking, at the very start of the journey.

But that might seem snooty. Plus it's vanilla and dull.

Instead, the best and most entertaining option is one I read about in a Penn & Teller book several years ago. It goes like this. Turn to your unwanted companion at the first opportunity, and explain to them that you have a condition which makes you sleep with your eyes open. It's harmless, you say, but it can be quite creepy - so you're taking the opportunity to warn them in advance so they don't freak out later. Then you sit back in your chair and silently wait a while. After about 10 minutes, slowly loll your head sideways toward them, keeping your eyes wide open the whole time, and stay there, staring at the side of their face, for as long as possible. They'll be far too weirded out to utter a word. Brilliant.

Probably doesn't work on cab drivers though, unless perhaps you're sitting in the front passenger seat. And even then it might make them crash.

Worth trying though.

I'll let you know.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Extracted from Times of India an interesting insight into the plight of indian politics or politicians

From Taslima to Tibet, India proves chicken

Jug Suraiya

Instead of the peacock, India should adopt the chicken as its national bird. Apart from the fowl being the dish of choice, at least in the northern part of the country, our official response to various situations - ranging from the Taslima Nasreen controversy to the protests in Tibet - can best be described as chicken-hearted.

Forced into exile from her native Bangladesh by religious fanatics who didn't like her feminist writings, Taslima sought sanctuary in Kolkata in whose Bangla milieu she felt creatively comfortable. However, after street riots instigated by local goons disguised as religious zealots caused the Marxist state government to decide that minority-appeasing discretion was the better part of secular valour, the writer was bundled out of the city and taken first to an undisclosed hideaway in Rajasthan and later to Delhi, where she was kept in virtual isolation.

Made to apologise for her 'anti-Islamic' views, she was warned by no less than the information and broadcasting minister - supposedly the custodian of the fundamental right to freedom of expression as spelt out in the Constitution - that she should not say or do anything that might hurt the religious sensibilities of any group. (Should the I&B ministry be renamed the ministry of intimidation and browbeating?)

Finally, Taslima has sought sanctuary in distant Scandinavia, saying: "A person who couldn't be scared by fundamentalists has been defeated by cold-blooded state terrorism inflicted by the Indian government. My terrible experience has shattered all my notions about a secular, democratic India.”

Why did Taslima - yet another personification of freedom of expression — have to quit India? Because when push comes to communal shove, for all its professions to the contrary, India is too chicken to stick to its principles of liberalism and democracy and allows mob rule to subvert the rule of law. In the case of the Chinese crackdown in Tibet, India's official response has been so politically correct, not to mention politically chicken, that it has earned praise from no less than the Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao (who might have made special mention of the Indian Left whose non-response might be summed up as 'Tibet who?').

Despite China's continuing claims on Arunachal, and despite its proven nuclear proliferation to Pakistan, New Delhi walks on eggshells where Tibet is concerned and seems vaguely embarrassed by the Dalai Lama's presence on Indian soil. Why? Because then, maybe, China will support India's admission to the UN Security Council. Or at least stop using Pakistan as a foil against us. Or sell us cheap pichkaris for Holi. Or something.

The truth is that we are just too chicken to take on the big demons - Chinese totalitarianism, religious fundamentalism - but make do with assailing minor imps of the perverse. For instance, Fiona Mackeown, mother of the murdered Scarlett Keeling, has been strictured for having left her 15-year-old daughter alone in Goa. What an unnatural, monstrous mother. How unlike the caring, sharing mothers of the suitably named Mother India, where female foeticide and infanticide are as common as the common cold. Or take the case of health minister Ramadoss who is so busy fighting the evils of tobacco and liquor - by putting 'gory' pictures on tobacco products, and banning surrogate liquor ads - that he has no time to address the much larger ills that plague our practically non-existent public health system.

Can't move mountains? Find convenient molehills, turn them into mountains, and then move them. That seems to be the recipe. Not just for the health minister but for the entire sorry mess which might aptly be called Indian chicken curry.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Green Peace

An Interesting Article DO READ

Attack polluting policies, not the Nano
13 Jan 2008,Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar

RK Pachauri, head of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change, is getting nightmares because of the Nano, Tata's Rs 1 lakh car. Sunita Narain of the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) says that it isn't the Nano by itself but cars overall that give her nightmares. The villains in my nightmares are neither the Nano nor cars overall, but stupid government policies that subsidise and encourage pollution, adulteration and congestion.

Sanctimonious greens call the Nano disastrous because of its affordability— millions more will now clog roads and consume more fossil fuel. This is elitism parading as virtue. Elite greens own cars, but cannot stand the poorer masses becoming mobile, since the consequent congestion will eat into the time of the elite!

More logical would be a protest against big cars that use more space and fuel, or highly polluting old cars. Instead, green hypocrites aim at a new car with the lowest cost, best mileage and least emissions.

The Nano will not burden us with too many cars. India has very few cars per person by world standards. London and New York have ultra-high car densities, yet have clearer air than Delhi. Our problem is too many bad policies, not too many cars.

We subsidise vehicles on a gargantuan scale invisible to layfolk. Roads and flyovers cost crores to build and maintain, yet road use is free (save on a few toll roads). Traffic police and lights are costly, yet are provided free. These invisible subsidies starve cities of funds to expand roads and public transport.

Land in cities now costs lakhs per square metre. Yet parking is free in the suburbs, and costs just Rs 10/day in city centres. A single parking space of 23 sq m occupies land worth Rs 40 lakh. A car occupies more space than an office desk, yet the desk space pays full commercial rent while parking space costs just Rs 10 per day.

Daily parking charges range from $15 (Rs 600) in Washington DC to $30 (Rs 1,200) in New York. CSE launched a sensible campaign to raise parking fees in Delhi to Rs 120, but was foiled. So, parking space now exceeds green space, a scathing comment on priorities.

The world price of oil has risen tenfold to almost $100/barrel, but Indian prices have barely doubled. Left Front politicians, who once wanted to soak the rich, now want to subsidise them. Under-recoveries of oil companies' total may be Rs 80,000 crore, far more than the cost of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the employment guarantee scheme put together. We sanctimoniously lecture rich countries to reduce their greenhouse emissions, yet subsidise our own.

Diesel is subsidised to be cheaper than petrol. So, Indian car producers produce the highest proportion of diesel cars in the world. Diesel fumes contain deadly suspended particles, P-10 and P-2.5. This subsidy kills.

So does kerosene provided at throwaway prices, ostensibly to benefit poor villagers. One-third of all kerosene is used to adulterate petrol and diesel. That causes horrendous pollution even in the greenest
of cars.

What's the way forward? We must abolish subsidies and raise taxes on vehicles and fuels to reflect their full social cost. The biggest but least visible subsidy is for parking, and we should start there.

Many car owners in the West take public transport to work since parking space downtown is costly and scarce. We should levy parking fees on an hourly, not daily basis. Rs 10/hour could be a starting point in the metros.

In parts of Tokyo, you cannot own a car unless you own a private parking space. This is too extreme for India, but indicates the future path. If we charge owners the full social cost of parking, people will buy smaller and perhaps fewer vehicles, and fewer still will take them to work. That will slash congestion and pollution.

Cities should levy stiff annual taxes on vehicles, not a one-time tax as in Delhi, and use the revenue to constantly expand public transport and roads. This will create economic synergy: private transport will finance public transport. London and New York have high-density public transport as well as high car density.

Apart from underground rail, cities need elevated roads to ease congestion and pollution. Lata Mangeshkar killed a proposal for an elevated road near her Mumbai flat saying pollution at her flat's level would affect her throat. She did not care that the throats of poor people living on the pavements were far worse affected by fumes, and might get relief if some fumes were diverted to a higher level. What elitism!

Next, some medicine that will be really bitter, politically. The excise duty on all automotive vehicles should be raised to reflect their social costs. Fuel subsidies should be abolished. Price differentials between petrol, diesel and kerosene should be removed, ending incentives for adulteration. Diesel cars should bear a heavy additional cess to finance improved healthcare for those affected by their emission of harmful particulate matter.

That is a long, politically difficult agenda. Only part of it will ever be achieved. Yet that is the way to go, rather than agitate against the Nano.